03-08-2016, 03:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-08-2016, 03:37 PM by DM Surranó.)
@Lugar
The greatsword was pretty obvious; she's never kept it in her haversack. Well, maybe once, while swimming to the cliff in the Prologue.
The wands, on the other hand, were never on display.
The hand is pretty easy to spot as it hung around her neck but nope, it's not metallic. It's an actual mummified elven hand. The chain, of course, is metallic (IIRC silver, just in case it matters)
Giant's clue, a bit morphed by Murkatos' insight, is a new perspective on the possible workings of the trap (I treat it like Aid Another) and calls for a new pair of Search/Disable checks... *ASSUMING* that it's true it will grant you a circumstance bonus but I won't tell you if it does or not...
@{Silent Giant}
About Lugar's retry on search/disarm. yes, he can retry but if he fails the search check by five or more that may set off the trap. And considering that a roll of 16 was insufficient to locate the trap...
The greatsword was pretty obvious; she's never kept it in her haversack. Well, maybe once, while swimming to the cliff in the Prologue.
The wands, on the other hand, were never on display.
The hand is pretty easy to spot as it hung around her neck but nope, it's not metallic. It's an actual mummified elven hand. The chain, of course, is metallic (IIRC silver, just in case it matters)
Giant's clue, a bit morphed by Murkatos' insight, is a new perspective on the possible workings of the trap (I treat it like Aid Another) and calls for a new pair of Search/Disable checks... *ASSUMING* that it's true it will grant you a circumstance bonus but I won't tell you if it does or not...
@{Silent Giant}
About Lugar's retry on search/disarm. yes, he can retry but if he fails the search check by five or more that may set off the trap. And considering that a roll of 16 was insufficient to locate the trap...
