04-05-2017, 06:44 AM
Briefly:
1. @Toot - revelations before the gate are OK. Please work together with @Shanna Rendin and @Merrinna Starsong to make sure it happened in a way that's accepted by all three involved players. (I don't care about the opinions of the rest 
)
2. @Toot, @Portho Nihilbuck - Sorry, psionics is not core. I particularly like it, the 3.0 variant better than the 3.5 variant, but I don't feel the need to introduce it as "rules available". That doesn't mean you can't use it as seasoning (purely roleplaying-wise).
3. @Torin - the proper part of the quote is that no creature with the type "animal" can have an Int score higher than 2, so either the spell changes your type to animal or retains your Int, but not both. Alternatives being: you become a magical beast, or you can't morph into an animal in the first place.
1. @Toot - revelations before the gate are OK. Please work together with @
)2. @Toot, @Portho Nihilbuck - Sorry, psionics is not core. I particularly like it, the 3.0 variant better than the 3.5 variant, but I don't feel the need to introduce it as "rules available". That doesn't mean you can't use it as seasoning (purely roleplaying-wise).
3. @Torin - the proper part of the quote is that no creature with the type "animal" can have an Int score higher than 2, so either the spell changes your type to animal or retains your Int, but not both. Alternatives being: you become a magical beast, or you can't morph into an animal in the first place.
