02-09-2018, 02:20 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-09-2018, 02:26 AM by Sumayl al-Akhir.)
(02-08-2018, 12:24 PM)GM Marvel Wrote: I chose the Sword +4 because: 1: I assumed the Cavilier would want one of the Scimitar of Speed, and 2: I'm kind of the second tank. Since Tina has joined and shown interest in the Scimitar I can give the Sword +4 to him so he can use it as a +4 Scimitar. But since I'm the second warrior in the group I'd like to replace it with the +2 Giant Slayer since it's probably the next best sword after the Scimitar of Speed +4, Sword +4, and the Short Sword of quickness +2, which it seems all will have been taken.
@MiB CURSED? I guess no good deed really does go unpunished.
Up to you.. we can paper-rock-scissors for it.. lol
personally, spreading the damage per round out a bit in the party helps our overall effectiveness.. - I naturally as cavalier get a better 'to hit' with my sword by +1 but you have higher strength than I so those balance, my damage without magic is +1, again I believe yours is higher BUT I get 3/2 attacks while you only get 1.. so who knows how the damage would play out in actual combat. Your higher to hit and damage would favour short fights, whereas my multiple attacks favours the longer combats. It really depends.