[OOC] Return to the Rusty Rat - Printable Version +- RPG Addicts | We Know You're Hooked (https://forums.rpgaddicts.com) +-- Forum: Admin Discussions (https://forums.rpgaddicts.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +--- Forum: Archive (https://forums.rpgaddicts.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=123) +---- Forum: Keeper of the Seven Keys (DM Surranó) (https://forums.rpgaddicts.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=68) +---- Thread: [OOC] Return to the Rusty Rat (/showthread.php?tid=95) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
|
RE: Return to the Rusty Rat - Torin - 04-03-2017 In the next level we should increase that ape to a huge monkey and have 3d6+10 damage. RE: Return to the Rusty Rat - Toot - 04-03-2017 (04-03-2017, 09:27 PM)Lugar Wrote: I'm picturing Mighty Joe Young rolling around dodging blows and punching with his feet while upside down. Oh and a shimmering field around him just pissing people off, his Charisma is still low. ;P :p I don't want to push the AC bonus too much. The DM might make Toot act out the end scene to the original King Kong!! @Torin oh man would that work? Does the druids type actually turn to Animal? If so that would be awesome. If it's 1 animal per 2 levels could the animals from the pouch be affected too? (Name slips my mind right now) RE: Return to the Rusty Rat - Torin - 04-03-2017 (04-03-2017, 09:44 PM)Toot Wrote: @Torin oh man would that work? Does the druids type actually turn to Animal? If so that would be awesome. If it's 1 animal per 2 levels could the animals from the pouch be affected too? (Name slips my mind right now) It's depend on our DM. Before the revisited Polymorphing rules the Wild Shape was much more different and maybe more powerfull too: Original Wild Shape Wrote:Wild Shape (Su): At 5th level, a druid gains the ability to turn herself into any Small or Medium animal and back again once per day. Her options for new forms include all creatures with the animal type. This ability functions like the polymorph spell, except as noted here. The effect lasts for 1 hour per druid level, or until she changes back. Changing form (to animal or back) is a standard action and doesn’t provoke an attack of opportunity. I put my saved SRD 3.5 to here. RE: Return to the Rusty Rat - DM Surranó - 04-04-2017 Simply put, assuming the animal type would imply, among others, that the druid's Int would drop to 2. And this is not RAI, nor is Animal Growth. An interesting question, though, whether you can exploit Enlarge Person in that case, considering that a wild shaped humanoid druid is still a humanoid. ("unfortunately" (*evil dm cackle*) ruling out Toot who's a fey, but this also means not being subject to charm person, dominate person, etc.) EDIT: There seems to be a consensus in PF that polymorph-like effects (wild shape included) do not stack with any size changing magic. So effectively, you become immune to offensive size change attempts as well. For 3.5, at least Enlarge Person states PHB Wrote:Multiple magical effects that increase size do not stack, (...)The wording seems to be quite proprietary, e.g. could a medium character turn into a medium badger (wild shape into small badger then enlarge person)? Or could reduce work the other direction, turning into a tiny badger, or even a diminutive cat (at level 11)? There's some debate, though, whether transforming to a large animal counts as "increase size" at all. Some argue that you change from your normal self to a normal animal. But taking this wording now I create precedence by stating that in this game Multiple effects that alter your size in any manner don't stack, regardless how the size is altered. This does not rule out a humanoid altering self to some medium creature then applying Enlarge Person. This does not rule out illusions either, e.g. a three feet tall character may appear to be six feet tall, then enlarged-- still will appear as six feet tall and will actually be six feet tall. RE: Return to the Rusty Rat - Toot - 04-04-2017 Quote:OOC @Toot - oops, I missed your post... Just in case it didn't occur to some, wearing a magical helm necessitates removal of any other magical headgear, like, hats of disguise... So this may have been the first time @ Shanna Rendin saw your true form. I had planned for Toot to reveal himself earlier because we have at least one person in the group that's not the sharpest battleaxe in the armory; that's not the brightest candle in the box; not the sharpest marble; Dumber than a box of rocks; If brains were dynamite, he would be hard pressed to blow his nose; He could double the collective IQ of Waterdeep by just leaving the city; Slower than a... ummm... I think you get my point. So Toot really doubts his secret would last very long anyways so he planned to let the women know. This would have happened before the arrived in Fairyland because he wouldn't want to get stuck in gods knows where with two people who could want to step on him like he's a bug! So if you will allow it, I'd like to let them know before we go through the portal. (04-04-2017, 09:13 AM)DM Surranó Wrote: Simply put, assuming the animal type would imply, among others, that the druid's Int would drop to 2. And this is not RAI, nor is Animal Growth. Well then, I guess Toot will have to buy himself some potions of Expansion! And Enlarge Person can be made Permanent... SG... I'm not sure how DM Surrano handles casting spells with XP components but when making magic items another person can offer the xp's or spells as long as they are there with the creator. So to me it makes sense that you can do the same with Permanency. You sacrifice the 500xp at the time of the spell's casting instead of the Wizard then pay for the Permanency spell itself. Or you could pay a wizard to use his own xp's on you and I think the going rate for this is 25:1. That would be about 12,500gp's plus the cost of the Permanency. RE: Return to the Rusty Rat - Torin - 04-04-2017 (04-04-2017, 09:13 AM)DM Surranó Wrote: Simply put, assuming the animal type would imply, among others, that the druid's Int would drop to 2. And this is not RAI, nor is Animal Growth. NOT Revisited Polymorph Spell: Polymorph Wrote:Polymorph RE: Return to the Rusty Rat - Toot - 04-04-2017 Well I know you've made up your mind so there's not much point discussing it any further BUT I'd like to add a couple of points. I've been googling the question and most people believe in 3.0 you couldn't use Animal Growth but in 3.5 you can. I will have to do more research as to the reasons. Enlarge Person should work if the Druid is a humanoid because in 3.5 you retain your original type. So you could wildshape into a badger but you are still considered to be a humanoid. None of this matters for this game because the DM has said you can't add size onto anything that increases your size. But it's still something to look at for a regular game. It seems the wildshape rules in Masters of the Wild are thought to be better than the 3.5 rules. I haven't taken a look yet but I will because there's a druid in my RL game. Unfortunately he does not play a druid very well because he relies on the rest of us to tell him what to turn into or cast. It's quite annoying. RE: Return to the Rusty Rat - Portho Nihilbuck - 04-05-2017 (04-04-2017, 04:13 PM)Toot Wrote: Well then, I guess Toot will have to buy himself some potions of Expansion! Oh my gods. I totally forgot that Psionics could be considered core. And I forgot about dorje's. DM Surrano what is your ruling on psionics, does it exist in your game? And that leads to the second question, some GM's use a variant rule for magic/psionic transparency, meaning there is no seperate Psicraft v.Spell craft, or Use Psionic Device v. Use Magic Device. What is your take on this? Rules as written make psionics and magic seperate, but that has some huge repercussions, example Detect Magic/Dispel magic have no effect on psionics and visa versa. But the variant opens a HUGE door for me with yet another set of spell lists I have access to with UMD. What is your opinion? I am good either decision, but would rather it was clear now before it ever comes up IC. RE: Return to the Rusty Rat - Toot - 04-05-2017 (04-05-2017, 03:34 AM)Portho Nihilbuck Wrote:(04-04-2017, 04:13 PM)Toot Wrote: Well then, I guess Toot will have to buy himself some potions of Expansion! There are quite a few nifty Psionic powers that would be awesome to have available. RE: Return to the Rusty Rat - DM Surranó - 04-05-2017 Briefly: 1. @Toot - revelations before the gate are OK. Please work together with @ 2. @Toot, @Portho Nihilbuck - Sorry, psionics is not core. I particularly like it, the 3.0 variant better than the 3.5 variant, but I don't feel the need to introduce it as "rules available". That doesn't mean you can't use it as seasoning (purely roleplaying-wise). 3. @Torin - the proper part of the quote is that no creature with the type "animal" can have an Int score higher than 2, so either the spell changes your type to animal or retains your Int, but not both. Alternatives being: you become a magical beast, or you can't morph into an animal in the first place. |